RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03835
COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational
benefits to his dependents without incurring an additional
Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was previously briefed that his Transfer of Education
Benefits (TEB) would not require an additional ADSC because he
was retirement eligible on or before August 2009. However, on
5 August 2013 he learned from the Total Force Service Center
(TFSC) that this option expired as of 3l July 2013.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 27 January 1989.
He retired on 30 April 2014 after serving 25 years, 3 months and
4 days on active duty.
Transferability of Unused Education Benefits to Family Members.
Subject to the provisions of DoDI 1341.13, Post-9/11 GI Bill,
the Secretary concerned, to promote recruitment and retention in
the Uniformed Services, may permit an individual eligible for
Post-9/11 GI Bill educational assistance to elect to transfer to
one or more of his or her family members all or a portion of his
or her entitlement to such assistance.
* Eligible Individuals. Any Service member on or after
1 August 2009, who is entitled to the Post-9/11 GI Bill at
the time of the approval of his or her request to transfer
that entitlement under this section, may transfer that
entitlement provided he or she meets one of these
conditions:
o Has at least 6 years of service in the Military
Services (active duty or Selected Reserve), National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Commissioned
Officer Corps (NOAA) Corps, or Commissioned Corps of
the Public Health Service (PHS) on the date of
approval and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the
Military Services, NOAA Corps, or PHS from the date of
election.
o Has at least 10 years of service in the Military
Services (active duty or Selected Reserve), NOAA
Corps, or PHS on the date of approval, is precluded by
either standard policy (Service or DoD) or statute
from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to
serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such
policy or statute.
o Is or becomes retirement eligible during the period
from 1 August 2009, through 31 July 2012, and agrees
to serve the additional period, if any, specified in
the following subparagraphs. A Service member is
considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has
completed 20 years of active Federal service or
20 qualifying years as computed pursuant to Title 10,
United States Code (USC) § 12732. This subparagraph
will no longer be in effect on 1 August 2013, and on
or after that date all members must comply with
subparagraphs above to be eligible for transfer of
unused education benefits to family members.
? For individuals eligible for retirement on
1 August 2009, no additional service is required.
? For individuals eligible for retirement after
1 August 2009, and before 1 August 2010, 1 year
of additional service is required.
? For individuals eligible for retirement on or
after 1 August 2010, and before 1 August 2011,
2 years of additional service is required.
? For individuals eligible for retirement on or
after 1 August 2011, and before 1 August 2012,
3 years of additional service is required.
* The provisions of DoDI 1341.13, subparagraph 3.a.(3) will
apply to Service members recalled to active duty under the
provisions of Title 10 USC § 688 or members of the
Individual Ready Reserve ordered to active duty under the
provisions of Title 10 § 12301(d) only when the active duty
is for a period of at least 90 days.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. The applicant provides no
evidence of error or injustice on the part of the Air Force. On
1 March 2013, the Air Force published Air Force Guidance
Memorandum to AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Program,
indicating the retirement eligibility dates the applicant
referred to would expire on 31 July 2013. This document was
distributed to the lowest levels in the Air Force. In addition,
the Air Force published several articles through Public Affairs
to notify members of the pending change. The applicant also
indicated on his Preseparation Counseling Checklist dated
13 March 2013, that he would like counseling on his education
benefits. While the applicant contends that he falls under the
paragraph which states: "For those members eligible for
retirement on or before 1 August 2009 no additional service is
required." Those exceptions expired on 31 July 2013, and now
all members who apply for TEB incur a four-year ADSC.
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The advisory opinion is both incorrect and unreasonable. The
Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) states that the
evidence does not support that he is a victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, he feels compelled to explain the
multiple official errors and injustices which resulted in this
unfortunate situation. The OPR states "We find there has been
no injustice to the extent that the service member did not
receive adequate counseling as required by law and DoD
regulation." Although he sought counseling on multiple
occasions, a series of official errors and official ignorance of
policy, nullified any adequate counseling. Since this "adequate
counseling" was required by law and regulation, there is a clear
injustice, and therefore he should be allowed to transfer his
Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his family.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. According
to DoDI 1341.13, dated 31 May 2013, no additional service was
required for those members that were retirement eligible on
1 August 2009. Although those exceptions expired on 1 August
2013, the evidence reflects that the applicant was eligible for
retirement on 1 August 2009. Therefore, it appears the
applicant may not have been properly counseled regarding the
steps necessary to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill to his
dependents without incurring an ADSC. As such, we do not find
it reasonable that he would have knowingly elected not to pursue
use of this important entitlement. In view of the foregoing, we
recommend the applicants record be corrected to show that he
elected to TEB to his dependents before the ADSC exceptions
expired. Accordingly, we recommend his records be corrected as
set forth below.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on
30 July 2012, he elected to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill
Educational Benefits to his dependents.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-03835 in Executive Session on 1 July 2014, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the record as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 August 2013.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 5 September 2013,
w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 October 2013.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 2 November 2013.
.
Panel Chair
4
4
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05062
As a United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) graduate, he was not eligible for the Montgomery GI Bill. He would have requested TEB for Post-9/11 GI Bill had he understood that the eligibility requirements were different. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02823
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02823 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 11 Mar 11 application for transfer of her Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to her dependents be approved with an Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date of 10 May 15. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial as there is no evidence the applicant signed the SOU in Mar 11. THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02064
In accordance with AFI 36-2306, For individuals eligible for retirement on 1 Aug 09, no additional service is required. Given that the applicant was eligible for retirement prior to 1 Aug 09, he would have incurred no active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation with TEB approval. Based on the applicants retirement date, he retired prior to the TEB program being established and therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02170
The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider her untimely application because in 2008 she investigated her dependents ability to claim the education benefit and was told that since she did not transfer while on active duty it could not now be done. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02270
The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because in 2008 he investigated his dependents ability to claim the education benefit and was told that since he did not transfer while on active duty it could not now be done. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00275 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application in order to allow his children to have access to his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits. We took notice of the applicants complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03525
For individuals eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009, no additional service is required. For individuals eligible for retirement after 1 August 2009, and before 1 August 2010, 1 year of additional service is required. Since the stand-up of the TEB website on 1 August 2009, when a member submits a TEB request and does not allocate months of benefits to a dependent, a message pops up which states: "Warning: You have one or more eligible family members to whom you have not transferred months.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219
Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the members request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02960
The Board should consider it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application as the benefit was instituted in 2009 and he was not informed that such a program existed. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03864
In accordance with AFI 36-2306, For individuals eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009, no additional service is required. Based on his TAFMSD, he would have incurred no active duty service commitment (ADSC) obligation with TEB approval. On 31 May 13, the applicant retired from the Air Force. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...